Film Review: Grand Prix

The recent buzz surrounding Ron Howard’s new film “Rush” got me thinking about motorsport in movies and in particular, Formula One. Films with a sporting theme at their core are always a little iffy with audiences and often don’t mirror the success in box office receipts as the sports themselves do with fans however, there have been a few exceptions over the years. Boxing and baseball seem to be the safest bet in Hollywood for studio bosses and yet, considering F1’s global popularity it’s cinematic outings are somewhat rare.

Arguably the most famous racing movie to date is Steve McQueen’s “Le Mans” from 1971 and love it or loathe it, you have to concede that it is a bonafide racing spectacle. But it’s not F1. It’s an annual 24 hour endurance race. And if we discount Asif Kapadia’s excellent “Senna” that came out in 2010 on the basis that it’s a documentary rather than a dramatised biopic or adaptation, we have to go back to 1966 to find a film based on Formula One.

John Frankenheimer, who helmed “Grand Prix” began his directing career in television shows like “Playhouse 90” for CBS but after making the transition to movies he found critical and commercial acclaim in the early ’60s with a string of hits including “Birdman of Alcatraz”, “The Manchurian Candidate”, “Seven Days in May” and “The Train” – four cracking films that share nine Oscar nominations between them. “Grand Prix” was his most ambitious project to date and oddly enough, it would also be his first shot in colour. Which of course helped capture the splendour and spectacle that was (and still is, for some) Formula One.

The film boasts an international all-star cast headed by James Garner and Eva Marie Saint as well as virtually all the racing drivers you care to mention from the era. And what an era it was! With beautiful cars unspoiled by sponsorship logos and downforce addendum, circuits that were little more than country lanes in places with no corner markers or kerbing to aid the drivers, it was a great deal more exciting than the regulation-strangled sport of today is. But then it was also far more deadly and according to IMDB, five of the real-life drivers who participated in the film died in racing accidents in the next two years and another five in the following ten years. It’s no wonder things had to change.

The film puts us right down there on the starting grid from the get-go with a highly charged opening sequence designed by the legendary Saul Bass – the man who gave us perhaps some of the most iconic opening titles in the history of cinema (“The Man with the Golden Arm” and “North by Northwest” to name but two). We can almost smell the gasoline and the hot engines of the racing cars as the 70mm Super Panavision film captures close-up images of spark plugs being tightened by mechanics, rev counter needles flicking towards redlines, tyres, exhaust pipes, the expectant crowd waiting for the Monaco Grand Prix to start. All these images overlaid with the soundtrack of a race about to thrill us. It’s gobsmacking.

The same goes for all the racing sequences throughout the film as we behold several of the world’s greatest circuits in their earlier days, Spa and Monza (complete with the infamous banking section) being of particular interest for the way they have now changed. For F1 fans, especially those that find interest in its history, this movie is a must-see!

The plot away from the racing leans a little towards soap-opera melodrama but it injects a dose of glamour and gives the actors something else to do other than race. (Apparently James Garner was so competent behind the wheel that real F1 drivers Graham Hill and Jack Brabham told him he could have been a successful driver had he not gone into acting). The film follows the fates of four drivers through a fictionalised version of the 1966 season, their ups and downs and the women who love them and try to deal with this most dangerous of lifestyles. On the whole, the acting is faultless.

The main character of “Grand Prix” though is the racing itself and Frankenheimer, who had always been a bit experimental with camera angles, was adamant to never cheat his audience with back projections or speeded up film. With cameras mounted onto the racing cars, (sometimes even swivelling from an ahead shot of the track round to the driver!) and on a following or trailing Ford GT40 camera car driven by Phil Hill (the only American-born driver to win a F1 Drivers’ Championship) he really nails the action. Add this to real footage of the 1966 season and there’s very little else like it other than watching a current race. And if you’ve ever seen his 1998 thriller “Ronin”, you’ll remember the car chase and you’ll know how good Mr Frankenheimer is at capturing excitement via speeding cars. The film won 3 Oscars at the ’67 Academy Awards – Best Sound, Best Film Editing and Best Effects/ Sound Effects and it’s not hard to see why.

Ron Howard’s new film is rightly garnering the attention at the moment and it may even go some way to improving Formula One’s image in the United States however, it was undoubtably Frankenheimer’s “Grand Prix” that laid the cornerstone 47 years ago. If you’ve never seen it and you love racing, I urge you to do so. It’s a rush!

COMRADE FOX: Low-living in Revolutionary Russia (The Life and Times of Archibald Brinsley Fox) by Stewart Hennessey

“I never gave a monkeys for Marxism or Monarchism or Liberalism or Conservatism or Socialism or any ism. I’ve always been leery of anyone brandishing an ism – an excuse to howl at the moon if you ask me. And they’re all moralists too, always got it in for someone else, usually someone like me.” – Archibald Brinsley Fox.
Written in the style of a diary, ‘Low-Living in Revolutionary Russia’ is Archie Fox’s story of his time spent in Revolutionary Russia. He spent his time cosying up to Lenin, trying to seduce his mistress and hunting for a Faberge egg, but all that is just the surface level of this book. He marks the difference between bolsheviks and Mensheviks, describes the call to arms in Petrograd and even prisoners of war going on strike. With a large collection of well researched endnotes adding to the story, this is one for those with an interest in The October Revolution and those with a liking for adventure and intrigue.

Personally, I’ve never been a huge fan of historical novels, although I always feel like I should be, but Archie Fox’s adventures are genuinely captivating; so much so that I found myself reaching for the endnotes to learn more. Archie is headstrong, with loose morals and yet you can’t help but like him. You might not want to spend any time in his company, but as a character in a book he offers the perfect balance of intrigue and despicable behaviour. Simply put, it’s a love-hate scenario.

The writing style is what really makes this novel captivating, as it has an upbeat rhythm which ensures that you can’t stop reading. Combine that with Fox’s escapades and you very quickly become swept along with the story and forget that it is rooted in historical accuracy; until the name Lenin pops up. Hearing about a man trying to seduce Lenin’s mistress catches your interest like nothing else. It simply isn’t the type of thing you learn at school or college and for anyone who doesn’t have a firm knowledge of revolutionary Russia, this is one of the most effective ways of learning about it.

I imagine that this could be a book to divide the audience, as those who are particularly sensitive to political correctness might not see the humour in it, but in my experience anything that doesn’t beg to be accepted by the masses is usually worth a read and a little controversy never did anyone any harm.

Do The Boston Boys Satisfy?

<!–
google_ad_client = “ca-pub-6469969007044671”;
/* Anne Iredale */
google_ad_slot = “4931800784”;
google_ad_width = 728;
google_ad_height = 90;
//–>

http://www.rocketcontest.org/contact.cfm

So called because they came together whilst attending college in Boston, The Boston Boys are described as exponents of electric bluegrass, folk rock and other genres.

Having toured in many different countries, no doubt they have soaked up many different cultural influences. They have been compared to the likes of Mumford & Sons and Wilco, so I was keen to listen to their 5-track EP, titled Keep You Satisfied (released in October 2013); besides, I’m a sucker for a bit of fiddle and mandolin.

This is their second EP, in fact, and it starts with an upbeat, folk rock blend called Satisfied, containing some sweet slide guitar in what turns out to be my favourite track. This is followed by the slower Amelia, about a night in the city, yearning for the eponymous girl of the title.

Endless Creation is a bit of a mishmash and lacks focus. Its experimentation with different sounds and tempos didn’t really work for me. I thought it was kinda clumsy and not very satisfying. Honeycomb has some bluegrass instrumentation mixed with a soulful vocal. Again, viagra pill it’s an unusual mix and I think will take a few plays to get used to. Finally, Take Me Under is a pleasing, uncomplicated folkie ballad.

Sometimes, they bring too much to the table. It doesn’t always work, but full marks for the attempt to do something different. I think they work best when they’re not trying to innovate so much. A work in progress, then, this band has great potential. This latest offering is produced by the band and perhaps it needed another producer in the studio to bring a bit of discipline and focus. As with most bands in the folk rock tradition, they look like a good band to see live.

http://thebostonboys.bandcamp.com/

A visual teaser is on Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Wjqzd5c84Q (Preview) and their “Hypnotized” video can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDr_NHa5bC4 (Preview)

Streaming link: http://thebostonboys.bandcamp.com/
Websites:
www.thebostonboys.com
https://www.facebook.com/TheBostonBoys
http://instagram.com/bostonboysband
https://twitter.com/BostonBoysBand
http://www.youtube.com/user/bostonboysofficial?feature=watch

Videos:
Satisfied EP Teaser – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Wjqzd5c84Q (Preview) Hypnotized – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDr_NHa5bC4 (Preview) Wish I Knew How Tt Would Feel To Be Free –
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYj89T3apJ8 (Preview) Tuk Tuk live – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oEnrTTkGZA (Preview)
Artist contact: bostonboysmanagement@gmail.com
Press contact: james@independentmusicpromotions.com

Bullfighting Awarded Cultural Status Despite Opposition

Bullfighting may be one of the last bloodsports to disappear completely, due to a legislation which has awarded it with a special status in Spanish culture.

According to the Guardian, the bill – which was passed with twenty-four votes to six – solidifies the status of bullfighting as “part of the cultural heritage worthy of protection throughout the national territory”, despite strong and vocal opposition from every direction. However, almost all of the amendments put forward by these opponents were rejected by the right-wing People’s Party.

Although conjuring up a stereotypical image of Spanish culture, there has been a gradual decline in the popularity of bullfighting, due to ongoing pressure from animal rights groups and campaigns which demand greater recognition of and support for animal welfare; in short, to stop citing entertainment and culture as reasons to put animals through deaths preceded by great torment and suffering. It is notable that some of this support for animals comes from within Spain, in the form of “Torture is not Culture”.

The growing awareness is also in part due to tourists seeing for themselves exactly what the animals go through; in the annual Running of the Bulls in Pamplona, the event does not stop with the “running”, and in fact the bulls are rounded up into an arena and meet a similarly violent and distressing end to the bulls in bullfighting.

The ban of bullfighting has been successful and complete in Catalonia and the Canary Islands, but as yet is limited to these places, as other regions attempt to preserve bullfighting as a tradition. But one of the only things going for bullfighting, in this day and age, is the notion of “tradition”, which is not dissimilar to the tactics used by many countries to boost tourism, and thus the economy.

In this respect, one of the best ways to stop events featuring animal cruelty, such as bullfighting, is not to have any role in it while travelling abroad, even as a spectator, as this involves contributing to suffering, which must sooner rather than later lose its “status” as a national tradition.

Just Like Robin Hood . . .

Robin Hood 1

I have heard Bipolar Disorder described in many ways. Perhaps one of the most confounding descriptions I have heard is that it is like a thief, stealing from you and never giving back.

This may well be the case for many people, but it is not the case for me. Yes, bipolar is a disorder that takes a lot from you: from me it has taken, at various times in my life, my friends, my family, the only man I have every truly loved, my career, my figure, my health, my sanity, and finally, my will to live.

But it has given me a lot in return.

I see the world in a way most people simply cannot fathom. I do not say that this is a better way of viewing things, or that it makes me in any way better than those who see things the ‘normal’ way, it is simply an observation: I do see the world from a different perspective. A perspective so different in fact, that at certain times I find myself beyond frustrated, because so many people in my life are simply incapable of understanding what I’m try to say. This has nothing to do with intelligence—although it is true that many people with bipolar and similar disorders are also highly intelligent—it is a matter of perspective.

That is the gift of bipolar. An ability to look at things in a completely different way, and quite often find the beauty in them where others see nothing but mundanity. One needs only to look at the works of Van Gogh to have some understanding of what I’m speaking about; he saw the world in far greater detail than the majority of people ever could. He saw the wonder in that intricacy, the stunning nature of situations and objects that others would have found commonplace.

Van Gogh is now widely considered to have been bipolar. His insanity, for want of a better word, is well documented, but so too is his vision.

Van Gogh

There are downsides to my cycling moods, no matter which state I am in. It has to be said that I find the depression the most difficult to deal with, the hardest to drag myself through without causing myself physical harm. It is also arguable that I do more damage to myself while manic, for I tend to act during these times, and my actions have severe consequences. The positive thing about both states however, are the insight you gain.
This is a commonality I have found many people with mental illnesses share, so much so that my fiction writing began to explore just what this meant. A series of novels was born, looking at people with various mental health issues and how they see the world as a result. These novels are heavily metaphorical, using paranormal elements and some of the more enigmatic sub-cultures in society to demonstrate various points. The very fact I was able to write them however, tells me that my ‘illness’ is not entirely bad.I am well aware that my best work has happened while I have been completely manic. I have sudden bursts of creativity and productivity, during which time I complete entire novels, huge sections of my thesis, or write full papers, in a very short space of time. These works are not always brilliant, although I am generally always convinced that they are brilliant while still in the grips of mania. What they are, however, are the building blocks of my world view. And it is so very, very different, to the view that most people have.

Scales

Such thoughts I would never have had, if it had not been for my bipolar. It is my hope that my writing will some day allow others to gain some insight into this very elusive perspective I am trying to explain. It is what I say to myself when I step on the scales each week, or catch a glimpse of myself in the mirror: my body may be ruined, but my mind is not.

Contrary to popular opinion, being ‘crazy’ does not mean you are incapable of higher though. Quite the contrary.

I know a lot of people with similar conditions to my own, and indeed other people with bipolar, who have stated categorically that, despite the fact they hate what bipolar does to their lives, were they able to take it away, rid themselves of it completely, they would choose not to.

If a magical pill existed, that could cure bipolar, would you take it?

I wouldn’t.

My psychiatrist recently offered me the option of taking lithium based MEDs. After discussing it with him at length I eventually declined. My reason for this was simple. The lithium would further stabalise my moods and decrease the depressive episodes from which I still suffer, despite the MEDs I’m on. It would make be feel, for want of a better word ‘flat’.

I have no wish to be flat.

This may sound very strange considering how horrendous this illness can be, yet I am given to understand it is not an unusual reaction for patients to have. Last week I remarked that many people, myself included, begin to heavily link their condition to their identity and, as a result, do not know who they are, or how to cope, if and when they feel ‘better’. Lithium, at least to me, seemed like a far worse curse than becoming, for want of a better word, ‘normal’.

Lithium would actually flatten out the ups and downs a person who didn’t suffer from bipolar would have.

I have an aversion to the colour beige. It is, to me, far more so than grey, the blandest colour imaginable. I currently live in a world of vibrant colour. Sometimes those colours are angry, blacks and reds, deep stains of purple and flashes of violent orange. Other times they are more bubblegum colours, pinks and lilacs, the colour the ocean always is in postcards of places you’ve never been to, but would love to see.

Lithium would make the whole world beige.

No reds, no purples, no oranges or black. No bubblegum pink and ocean blue. Just beige. Flat, unremarkable, uneventful, emotionless beige.

I may despise the negative aspects of my condition, but I also appreciate the positive sides. I know the gifts I am given, and I am not ungrateful for them. I would never wish to be without them, even if that means continuing to endure the bad, so that I might also have the good. To do otherwise, I feel, would be to become a different person entirely.

Robin Hood 2

Bipolar is a thief?

Yes, there is no denying this. It is an illness that robs you of a great many things, things that can never be recovered, things that are unbearably painful to lose. But, contrary to the expression, bipolar does give back, in ways that are difficult to understand if you have never experienced them for yourself.

If bipolar is a thief, then it’s Robin Hood. And that’s perfectly fine with me.

Ticker

Besotted With Psychosis

Blog 0006 Keep Calm and CrazyThere is such a thing as being in love with your diagnosis; besotted by psychosis.

I have noticed a trend in many people who suffer from mental illnesses—including myself—to freely share with others, often people they have only just met, the fact that they are both mentally ill and taking strong medications, in particular anti-psychotics, in order to manage their condition. This does not apply to everyone (nothing ever does) but certainly some people appear to relish telling others that they are on anti-psychotics and, by so doing, that they are or have at some point been, psychotic. They wear this fact like a medal, showing with pride that they have come through something horrendous, something most people (thankfully) never have to face and can’t really understand. A war veteran, home from the front.

I believe it goes deeper than this, however, far deeper than the relatively simple need to announce to the world that yes, despite all the odds, you are still alive. You survived. I believe for many people, it is not that they are ‘showing off’ their condition, it is more that their diagnosis has become so irrevocably tied to their identity, to their sense of ‘self’, that when they are interacting with others and introducing themselves to new people, talking about their condition, even if only in passing, is unavoidable.

This is certainly not the case for everyone; many people find it incredibly difficult to discuss their condition.

I am not one of those people.

The merging of diagnosis and identity can be both a positive and negative thing. I have personally found, since being diagnosed, that knowing my condition and exploring the extreme extent to which it has affected almost every aspect of my life, for the better part of two decades, helps me to understand myself better, my past better, and to come to terms with and let go of some of the more damaging memories in my possession; memories which have, until relatively recently, refused to die. It is both comforting and enlightening to know that certain phases of my life were exacerbated by my condition, that certain decisions and situations I have never been able to understand, were actually caused by the changing chemicals in my brain, rather than a deficiency in myself, as a human being.  I have become more at peace as a result of this, and find that, the better I come to understand, the less I despise myself.

These are the positives.

The flip-side (isn’t there always a flip-side?), is that I become so fixated on analysing my mind and moods and behaviour, that I often forget there have actually been periods in my life when I wasn’t either depressed or manic. Certainly in my early teens I never experience the rapid cycling moods to which I became accustomed in my late teens and twenties. I had ups and I had downs, certainly, but they were never as pronounced, never as protracted, and they almost always came with lulls in between—times when I was, for want of a better word ‘normal’. At least in so much as a young teenage girl can ever feel normal. I had problems, but they had nothing to do with my condition. Even later, there were times when I was not depressed, or manic, or psychotic, I simply was. It’s easy to lose sight of this and forget there were times when I had friends, and jobs, and hobbies, and was successful in my endeavours, comfortable in social situations, capable of functioning like most other people.

I know enough people now, suffering from bipolar or other mental illnesses, to know that this is a common development.

And it can be crippling.

It is as if being depressed, bipolar, schizophrenic, psychotic etc. has become so much a part of how we perceive and define ourselves that the notion of there being any form of ‘self’, existing without the illness, is foreign to us; it’s alien. Some people even rile at the use of the word ‘illness’. I am one of those people, at least when it comes to myself, for I do not like the connotations, the notion that being bipolar makes me ‘ill’, it makes me in some way ‘wrong’. It is the thought that other people see me as being less than I should be. It is the thought that, as a consequence of this, they only accept what I am when I am neither depressed nor manic. If I am one way or the other I am in some way ‘not myself’.

Who am I then, at these times, if not myself?

There is an inherent contradiction here in that, while I am capable of acknowledging the downsides of both depressive and manic states, while I am capable of realising they can be unhealthy for me and that I must seek help to manage my condition, while I am now, reluctantly, even willing to take very strong medication to aid me in that management, I would never, ever, think of myself as being less than myself while depressed or manic. Those states of being are still ‘me’; in fact they are the versions of me with which I am comfortable, familiar, because I understand them far better than I understand this thing called ‘normal’.Blog 0006 Poe

There is a famous quote from one of my favourite authors, Edgar Allan Poe: ‘I became insane, with long intervals of horrible sanity’. I have always loved this quote. Long before I was diagnosed with bipolar, a condition Poe himself is suspected of having suffered, I had that quote scribbled in my notebooks and written in lipstick on my bedroom mirror. It resonated with me, from a very young age. I think I was perhaps ten or eleven when I first came across it, and even then, I somehow felt what it meant for me.

Insanity is relatively easy to deal with, if you are as accustomed to it as I have become. By ‘insanity’ I refer to those periods when I have been either depressed, manic, or in particular psychotic, those times when others would tell me I ‘wasn’t myself’ and I would wonder who else I could possibly be. Depression is a separate kind of insanity I feel, for it is the definite negative area of the complex condition known as bipolar. Mania and psychosis are two entirely separate things, and from my own experience of them, can have both positive and negative consequences. Certainly I find I enjoy my manic phases, I experience a clarity of thought during those times which eludes me the rest of the time. The trouble comes when the mania goes beyond my own thought processes and niggling physical side effects such as keeping me from sleeping or eating, and results in some very dangerous behaviours. Psychosis is often extremely unpleasant, however it depends upon the form it takes. Many people find it comforting. Others find it is what they need to get through the day. I have found it, at different times in my life, terrifying beyond description and the safest I have ever felt in my life. Psychosis is not a thing easily explained, nor is mania, yet they are states that become very familiar to a person, and—like depression—the more familiar they become the easier it is to remain in them, even when you don’t particularly enjoy their effects.

There is a safety in being either depressed or manic. You know what to expect, and you know what is expected of you. That contradiction comes in again, for while I hate people perceiving me as being ‘ill’ and ‘not myself’ when I am in these states, it does give you carte blanche to some extent: no matter what you do, no matter how crazy you appear, no matter how little you manage to achieve, no matter what your appearance or manner, it all falls beneath that great banner of ‘insanity’. You are forgiven. You are absolved. You can screw up as much as you like, and the majority of people will understand that this ‘isn’t your fault’ because you’re ‘ill’. It is often far easier to remain in these states than it is to try and cope with the state that falls between the two poles, that elusive state of ‘normality’. That is not for one second to suggest that depression, mania or psychosis are pleasant, merely that they are familiar, more familiar than ‘normal’ ever could be because this is the state of which I now have the least experience.
Normality is what frightens me.

It is mundane, ordinary, the discovery that there is nothing special about me, something which I fervently believe when I am manic and psychotic and can even acknowledge to some extent when depressed. Normal is just like everyone else and, just like everyone else, if I am normal I have normal responsibilities: a job, rent, bills, acting in a socially acceptable manner. And if I am just like everyone else, I can fail just like everyone else, and this then might push me be back into the very states of being I both fear and oddly embrace. Mania, certainly, has its intoxicating allure. Even depression at times can feel like the safest option: shut down, stay down, it’s quiet down there, it’s immobile, you won’t move forward but neither will you move back. You can’t fail. You can’t be hurt, unless you hurt yourself. When you have lived a life of repeated failure and heartbreak the prospect of the latter is very appealing. I often find myself embracing mania, as it allows me to do the things I wish to do—I get so much work done, I embark on so many new projects, I do all the things I completely fail to do when depressed and far more than I could ever achieve if I were simply ‘normal’. The flip-side (again) is that mania for me now always ends with a crash; if I want to enjoy the manic periods, I must also endure the depression. I am only slightly ashamed to admit that at times it is only the thought of my next manic phase which allows me to make it through the depression relatively unscathed. This is the reason I refused to allow my psychologist to switch my MEDs to Lithium despite the fact what I currently take does not stop my swings in moods: Lithium would stop my depression, a plus, but it would also rob me of my mania. It would leave me permanently ‘normal’ and that is not something I am willing to become. The reason for this is simple: I would not then be myself.

Normal

What does this mean then, for my recovery? If getting ‘better’ means moving away from those states in which I feel like myself and towards the one state in which I feel like I’m ‘not myself’, how can I reconcile that? Taking the medications prescribed for me has certainly helped, I do not find myself at the very dangerous extremes I was experiencing previously, however I have found that I no longer recognise myself. Last week I talked about looking in the mirror and seeing someone else stare back. Some of this is the result of very long periods of depression, but some is the direct result of my attempts to recover from that depression.

I am currently attempting to lose weight, and moving towards living on my own again. I find, as I make progress in both these areas, that at times I am actually sabotaging my efforts. Self-sabotage. I see that my weight loss is going well, and I panic; what happens when I’ve lost all the weight, when I am healthy and back to looking like myself again? I’ll no longer have the buffer between me and socialising that currently protects me.

I often feel that I have purposefully built up this massive amount of weight around me, as a wall to shield myself from pain. In particular, a wall to shield me from people. I complain that I do not have the confidence to socialise due to my insecurities about my weight, yet I also do not want to socialise, if I am completely honest, due to a far deeper fear that things which have happened in the past will reoccur. Friends abandoning me when they see me acting in ways that are ‘not like myself’, romantic relationships going horribly wrong, and even, if I’m completely honest, the prospect that hypersexuality will once again set in. The worst period of my entire life happened when I was suffering from hypersexuality. It destroyed everything I had. It left me a rock bottom. It is the one thing about mania that absolutely terrifies me. But, if I stay so overweight, I need not fear; nobody would want me anyway.

This is a terrible thought for all kinds of reasons, but there it is. Similar to this is the thought of living alone. I’ve lived alone before, and it didn’t end well. I lost my job, found another, lost that too, found another, but still was unable to keep up rent and bill payments due to my excessive overspending and total inability to budget. The thought of that happening again, after I have spent the last two years trying to unravel the financial mess I was in, is terrifying, as is the thought of finally getting a place of my own and then losing it, is heartbreaking.

Better not to try than try and fail.

I have been wrestling with this for some weeks now. The diet which initially went so well and saw me lose over a stone hit a stall when I realised I’d lost twenty pounds and I might actually succeed. I regained five of those pounds almost overnight. I thankfully managed to recognise what I was doing and prevent the re-gain from becoming worse, but for two weeks it was all I could do to maintain my weight, there was no hope of me losing any. At the same time while everything appeared to be falling into place with my new business, and the prospect of moving out became a solid reality, within the next few months, I began to question everything, from whether or not I could cope with the business, to whether or not I should accept the Start Up loan I was offered to help me with it, to whether I should even be thinking of moving out at all, or if it weren’t better off staying with my mother.

It was the latter thought that finally broke through to me. Much as I love my mum, I do not love living with her. I have no independence. She drives me round the bend. Clearly, I wasn’t thinking rationally.

Scales

I am pleased to report that, with all this in mind, I have managed to lose just over four pounds this week. I am still afraid of what will happen if I ever do manage to get back to a state in which I feel comfortable socialising, however I am more afraid of spending the rest of my life alone and miserable. Things with my business are moving forwards, and while I’m still struggling to manage my own personal budget well enough to feel confident in living alone, I have improved considerably.

The next challenge to tackle is my PhD.

The one thing that has hit me with crystal clarity as a result of all this is that I have avoided it. I do everything I can in order to get out of working on it, because I am terrified of finishing it. I no longer feel I am capable of working in an academic setting, so much so that I didn’t even last the first year of my Scholarship living in Bangor. I took myself away from it. My former dreams of working at a University when I finish have vanished as a result. I do not feel I could possibly cope, therefore I do not want to finish my thesis, as this would mean I was expected to DO something with the qualification.

Hopefully, this realisation in itself will now aid me in getting on with it.

My Fitness Pal Ticker