Windows Reimagined: The Microsoft Ecosystem

Amidst all the talks of the newly launched Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8, talk has naturally focused on the specific systems. In the case of Windows Phone, the features have been getting all the attention – what does it offer? Is it as good as the iPhone? What most people aren’t observing, though, is the ecosystem; and it’s the ecosystem that is Microsoft’s main strength.

 

Apple positioned itself as the media leader with the release of the iPod and iTunes, and the reputation has only strengthened with newer incarnations of the iPod and iTunes’s increasing amount of content. Microsoft was never a serious contender to this crown because its services just weren’t very good – the home media centre was clumsy and complicated at best; Windows Mobile was outrageously cumbersome; and it just didn’t have the music and video content to compete with Apple. Microsoft had a reputation as the Old Guard, too far gone to ever compete with the trendy Apple.

 

But Microsoft had something of worth: the Xbox. With humble origins as a simple games console, it quickly blossomed into a media hub where you could watch things like BBC iPlayer and 4OD. Today you can use any number of apps, browse the Web, connect with friends, rent or buy films from Xbox (previously Zune) or streaming services like Netflix and LoveFilm. Then came Kinect, which lets users swipe their hand and scroll through their content, or talk to the console and tell it what to do, including Bing searches. The Xbox was Microsoft’s foot in the modern world that the company had to utilise to stay relevant in today’s world of sparkly, fast gadgets that rely on connectivity and being social.

 

Microsoft has utilised it to a commendable degree. While previous incarnations of Windows theoretically had home entertainment capabilities, they weren’t great. Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8, however, really show what the ecosystem is capable of. The Smartglass app allows users to play a film on their tablet, then let the Xbox pick it up to continue playing, and switch it back to the tablet again. Better yet, when an actor comes on screen, Smartglass on the phone or tablet will tell you who that person is. Tapping on the name will bring up a bio and filmography – it’s like going to their IMDB page, without going to IMDB. If you’re watching a film on LoveFilm and using Smartglass, it automatically sees the film you’re watching and gives you the overview, cast and reviews. You can also pause, rewind and forward the film through the app.

 

Seeing all the devices work together at Monday’s launch event was an impressive sight, and it highlights the futility in focusing solely on one device’s specs. Forget the devices themselves for now, push aside the nifty features like Kid’s Corner, live updates pushed to your home screen and Nokia’s stunning features in the Lumia 920. What Microsoft has aimed for, and executed marvellously, is a complete home entertainment system. Google’s Web services may be extensive, but they don’t provide anything of this calibre. Apple has something similar with Apple TV, but the communication between the devices isn’t the same. For instance, Apple TV lets you play your media on the TV wirelessly, but the iPhone will not then recognise who is on the screen and tell you all about them, nor does the phone become a remote control. Xbox Music is a Spotify-esque service that provides unlimited streaming, and offline playlists, for a mere £90 a year. Films can be rented or bought from the console, computer or phone and synced seamlessly between the devices through the user’s Microsoft account. Microsoft also made the smart decision of giving users control of their content – media downloaded from Xbox will work on the devices you want it to, not only on Microsoft devices.

 

While there’s no denying that uptake of Windows Phone remains slow, it’s now clear that Microsoft has created a wonderful ecosystem and the phones are only one segment of that. The Xbox dashboard looks almost identical to Windows 8 and Windows Phone, and that universal design is exciting to see. The ecosystem is visually immersive and extremely attractive – suddenly the grey list on iTunes looks dated. The tiles interface has also been utilised by other companies, including Google’s Play Store, Netflix and LoveFilm, which can only help boost recognition of Windows too. With Microsoft having changed what a PC can look like, there are millions of consumers who may suddenly see the appeal of a personal system like Windows Phone.

 

Whether Windows Phone 8 gains any more traction remains to be seen, but one thing’s for sure: Microsoft has turned a corner and is reinventing itself as a fresh, vibrant company with what may be the most compelling ecosystem out there – and that’s before we even consider Office, Skype and the business offerings.

 

 

 

Apple iPad Mini Event – Do We Really Need That?

On the 23rd of October, Apple held an event as usual telling the world that they’ve got “a little more” to show you. Now Apple is never very subtle regarding these things and from the rumors before, it was beyond all reasonable doubt that the Cupertino giant was going to release a smaller iPad.

The event started in usual Apple fashion with a whole bunch of statistics pertaining to why their company is the greatest. Three million iPod sales, 200 million devices running iOS 6 (not mine) and over three billion iMessages sent. Awesome.

A more significant statistic was the fact that Apple has sold over 100 million iPads in two-and-a-half years. Apple revealed that Apple sold more in the June quarter (Q3) more iPads than any PC maker has actually sold units.

Smile!

So up came Phil Schiller, and the moment everyone was waiting for: the iPad Mini. The device has a screen measuring 7.9 inches and has a resolution of 1024×768. No retina here. However, having the same resolution as the iPad 1 and 2 means that most apps will work fine. The iPad Mini also has virtually the same specifications as the iPad 2 with the same A5 CPU, same GPU, same RAM and storage options. In fact it would probably be easier to highlight the things that aren’t the same such as the cameras, whereas the iPad 2 has VGA front facing and 720p rear facing, the iPad Mini has 720p front facing and 5 megapixel rear with 1080p video, which I suspect is the same hardware found in the 4S. Another feature the Mini has over the iPad 2 is 4G LTE.

Really big cup of coffee...

The great question is, why would you buy a iPad Mini? If your iPhone 4S/5 is too small and your iPad is too big then you have problems. The way I see it, most people buying this will be the iSheep who will buy an iPoo without question because it was made by Apple. The other customers will probably include those who want to have an eReader sized tablet that has a bit more functionality than your everyday Kindle. I have serious suspicions over the lack of retina level resolution and I think that Apple may be gearing up themselves for a refresh that brings the higher resolution display. Hey, what can I say apart from ‘mo’ money’. The evolution of Apple mobile products is humourously demonstrated in this photo:

Take that religion!

From that track record, these devices much mean in the middle so I predict a Apple iPod Touch Note (Samsung reference totally intentional) measuring in with a 5.5 inch display.

One happy family...?

The event was not just about the Mini but also about Apple’s other products. The regular iPad got a minor spec bump to the 4th generation. The newer New iPad has a quicker A6X chip with an updated front facing camera, LTE improved WiFi and 10 hours of battery life whilst maintaining the same price as the original New iPad that it replaces. Now you can buy either the iPad 2 or the better specced iPad Mini for less or the 4th gen iPad. That’s the amazing kind of logic that sees the 6th iPhone named as the iPhone 5.

Wait what happened to the Air?

After the 15 inch MacBook Pro with Retina display, it was only a matter of time before we saw the same design and features to grace the smaller versions. In the same event, Apple unveiled the 13 inch MacBook Pro with Retina Display. This new iteration has the same slimmer body structure as it is void of any disc drive and with a very high resolution display of 2560 x 1600. The same amount of pixels as was in the once popular Apple 30″ Cinema Display. Apple’s decision of maintaining the same 16:10 aspect ratio will always be constant topic of debate. This will always be confusing for many new customers as the 11″ MacBook Air is 16:9, any of the 13″ or 15″ MacBook Air/Pros are 16:10 and the iMacs are 16:9. Totally logical, I know.

Chin is still there...

Finally, the Apple iMac was given a much awaited refresh. The 21.5 and 27 inch models have received a complete redesign. The back of these All-In-One’s have a surface that tapers so much that it gives the illusion that the iMac is much thinner than it actually is. The very sides of the new iMacs are a mere 5mm thick but much thicker in the middle. The new iMacs also introduce new graphics cards from nVidia with the top end one being the GTX 680MX, effectively a slightly downclocked desktop GTX 680 which is decent to say the least. However that particular GPU is still a mobile GPU and I expect modern gaming laptops will start shipping with those soon. The new iMacs also introduce some new storage technology called Fusion Drive that seeks to use SSDs and HDDs in tandem to increase performance while maintaining drive size…wait isn’t that what Seagate had as their Hybrid Drive? I seem to remember that Fusion io had something similar, oh and what about Intel Caching technology? Hmm…

And to finish, a closing word – sucks if anyone bought an iPad 3. Actually, sucks for anyone to have bought an Apple product this year at all. With slowing innovation in their mobile line and general overpricing of their other products (some of which I personally think are good in terms of hardware specs), I might genuinely have to think about moving my music library from iTunes to another provider…

The Best Coffee in Town

Like a good many of us, I enjoy a nice cup of coffee – straight up black, with milk or cream, latte, cappuccino, espresso – they all work for me depending on my mood and/or the time of day. Until recently though, I’d had to head out to my favourite shop in town in order to really find a satisfying cup (instant coffee being anathema to the true coffee lover), and even then, it was a bit hit and miss and seemed to depend on the barista on duty and certain other factors that I could never quite put my finger on. Sometimes my drink would taste bitter, too strong, not strong enough, too watery etc and often a cappuccino or latte would be far removed from what it should be. A good coffee is a thing of beauty and we can all probably recall a time when we’ve had the perfect cup; it sticks in the memory like a great meal or a superb bottle of wine.

How pleased was I then to be discover Nespresso Magimix coffee machines via a friend who had recently purchased one. My goodness, what a revelation! A wonderful cup of coffee every time and all without the need to step out in the rain and pay £2 or more for a drink that may or may not disappoint. Of course, the machine itself is a bit of an outlay (£200 give or take) but if you’re serious about your coffee, I tell you, it’s money well spent. Looks great on the kitchen counter too. Fill the machine’s tank with water, pop in the capsule of your choice, push a button and ‘Voila!’, a great cup of coffee is yours in the time it takes to get the milk out of the fridge. You want a cappuccino or latte? No problem. Just pour some milk into the heated frother, push another button and whizz it up to your desired frothiness. What could be simpler?

The range of coffees available is amazing too and whether your preference is for an intense espresso shot or a mild and aromatic latte, you’re sure to find a blend that will satisfy. I never really appreciated the subtle yet unmistakable variations in the different beans and the way they are prepared and roasted. The complexities of the coffee they make are as apparent as those in any fine quality beverage, be it wine, whiskey or even tea. And price-wise, compared to one of the high street coffee shops, a machine makes great fiscal sense too. Consider purchasing a coffee every day of the week for a year from say, Costa – that’s going to set you back over £700! In those terms, purchasing a machine of your own and enjoying cups that cost less than 50pence each sounds like good sense. Yes, I realise I’m omitting the social aspect – that is, of getting together with friends and catching up over coffee and croissants (who doesn’t enjoy that?), but aside from that, if you wish you could drink barista-standard coffee at home then, take my word for it, a Nespresso machine would be a worthwhile addition to your kitchen. Just don’t complain when your coffee-drinking friends start coming round more.

 

How the iPhone Changed the Mobile Industry

Today, the iPhone, taken as a collective for each generation rather than an individual version, is the most popular gadget in the world. When it launched in 2007, few people would have predicted that success, not least because Apple had never made a phone before, and was far from the behemoth it is today. Back then, Apple had found success with its iPod, but its Mac line of computers were far from a threat to Windows in terms of marketshare, and the presiding thought was that Nokia was just too big to have any competition, let alone from a company that had never made a phone. Microsoft’s Steve Ballmer laughed at the iPhone for lacking a physical keyboard thus not appealing to business users, and bragged about how Microsoft was selling “millions and millions” of phones. Unfortunately those phones were Windows Mobile, and I’ll be surprised if anyone on the planet has a good word to say about them.

There’s no denying it, the iPhone changed the industry. But why? It didn’t invent anything, touch screens were already around, although had not been adopted by the public at large; phones were already doing email, video playback, video calls. In fact, the first iPhone was lacking some serious features: Bluetooth file transfer, USB file transfer, multimedia messaging, multitasking, video calling, navigation, a camera that could take good pictures, it didn’t even have 3G connectivity. Despite this, it caught on and transformed the marketplace to such an extent that touch screens are now the overwhelming dominant style, and Samsung has built a lot of success copying that design. So what was it about the iPhone that made it so popular?

Simplicity. Unlike other touch devices before it, the iPhone was thin and sleek. It had consumer appeal. The operating system was easy to use, streamlined, and fast. While it lacked many features, what it did include were of a high standard – reading emails was now easier than ever, and accelerometer-based games grabbed everyone’s attention. There was no clunky interface, no trying to navigate a screen using a button to tell an invisible cursor where to go. Your finger touched glass, not plastic, and everything was only a click or so away. Then there were the apps – perhaps the main selling point for the iPhone, thanks to Apple’s “There’s an app for that” campaign. Again, Apple didn’t invent it, but it did perfect it. An easy to use App Store meant searching for and finding apps was a breeze, and developers saw the potential before them. There was a whole ecosystem to take advantage of here – downloading iTunes albums and shows straight to your device and then having the famous iPod interface before you was a breath of fresh air.

True to its tacit mantra, Apple has avoided copying much from other phone companies and instead followed its own path. While it did relent and include media messaging functionality, it still has refused to include Bluetooth file transfer, mass storage, or even adopt the universal micro-USB charging port. Instead, Apple looks at the last iPhone and decides on incremental updates to make that particular experience better. And it’s been incredibly cocky in doing so – the famous “You’re holding it wrong” from antennagate on the iPhone 4 and the “It’s normal” from scuffgate of the iPhone 5 may have left a sour taste in the mouth of some users, but it hasn’t slowed down sales. Apple isn’t lying when it says the iPhone 5 is the best iPhone yet – while there can be disputes over its technology not matching the innovation in other devices, it’s a step-up from each previous iPhone. With a larger screen, a faster processor, better graphics and large storage for all your media, there’s plenty for users to be pleased with. It’s the thinnest phone in the world, and impossibly light. Looking back to 2007 and the original iPhone, it’s come a long way and the ecosystem has never been better – there’s Apple TV, iCloud, iMessage, FaceTime, a very good camera with 1080p video recording, one of the best screens in the world and now turn-by-turn navigation to try to match the competition. And unlike the launch of the first iPhone, with its exclusivity to O2, it’s now available on every network with an array of new iphone deals.

iPhone 5 “Scuffgate” & Lumia 900 Durability

Since the release of the iPhone 5, Twitter has had a new trend: Scuffgate. It’s not been the best week for Apple, with the company being criticised for its maps, and the camera suffering from a purple hue for many users. Scuffgate, however, refers to many users noticing how easily the new iPhone scratches and scuffs, to the point that some are even taking damaged iPhones out of the box.

The reason the iPhone 5 scratches easily is because it uses anodised aluminium, and Apple Senior Vice President of Marking Phil Schiller has described this as normal, saying in response to a user email that “Any aluminum product may scratch or chip with use, exposing its natural silver color. That is normal.”

It’s not actually as normal as Schiller would like consumers to believe. Apple uses anodised aluminium for its Macbooks and iMacs, and they do not suffer the same problem. Nokia also uses it on its products E7 and N8, both of which are known for their ruggedness and durability. Aluminium itself may be a soft metal, but it is not “normal” for a phone to arrive scratched – if it were, Apple should have rethought the idea to use it. The real issue is that coating is very thin on the iPhone 5, making it particularly susceptible to scratches and scuffs.

 

For comparison, here’s a video of the N8 being deliberately scratched:

 

And while we’re on the subject of phone durability (and Apple’s lack of it), the Lumia 900 gets put through its paces to see how much damage it can take:

Frozen for 2 hours.

Cooked for an hour at 200F

Used as a hammer

Thrown from a moving car twice

Dunked in a pool

Results here: